Ironworks Pike Community Church
(502)-863-1261
  • Home
  • About Us
    • How To Be Justified of Sin.
    • Music & Worship
    • What Makes Us Distinct?
    • Our History
    • Ministries >
      • Children
      • Women's
      • Youth
      • Adult Bible Study
    • Statement of Faith
  • Messages
  • Contact Us
  • Pastor's Blog

"Who Created God, Then?", The Atheist Asked.

7/25/2015

0 Comments

 

To my surprise, I have read that "Who created God, then?" is considered by many modern atheists to be a sharp, insightful comeback to belief in God. It seems to be inspired by this line of thinking, expressed in Dr. Richard Dawkins' book, The God Delusion:

" Expounding creationist argument, viz., the absurdity of irreducibly complex biological system arising by natural means “without the intercession of a designer mind” and comparing the probability of assembling Boeing 747 from a tornado-ed junkyard to that of life assembling itself spontaneously, which is a popular illustration given by creationists, Orr explained that Dawkins responded to design argument with a “judo-like move” in which he turned creationist’s logic against itself. Quoting Dawkins, “[a] designer God cannot be used to explain organized complexity because any God capable of designing anything would have to be complex enough to demand the same kind of explanation in his own right.” Orr wrote."

So Dawkins' comeback sounds like a syllogism:

1. All complex things require a prior creator.
2. God is complex.
3. Therefore, God must have had a prior creator.

Can you see Dawkins' trick? 

It a straw man argument.  Christians, or even monotheists in general, do not claim that all complex things require a prior creator. We claim that most things do. Dawkins is not responding to the Christian claim, but to a slyly twisted version of it.

Second, Dawkins is ignoring the monotheist's definition of "God." The idea of "Creator of all things" necessarily includes self-existence. And the quality of self-existence nullifies the syllogism. His syllogism might strike a blow against polytheist religions like Hinduism and Mormonism, but not against a monotheist religion like Christianity.

When Christians say that there is an eternal Creator God, we mean that He pre-existed the creation. Eternal means that God is radically independent of everything. Independent to His very core. God in His nature as God has no external dependencies, no external contingencies, no external conditions for existence or action. And God created all things. Not a lot of things, or most things, but all things. 


Both claims mean God is self-existent. So, if the question is posed, "What is the origin of God's complexity?", the Biblical answer is, "God's complexity does not have an origin, because God by definition is eternal and self-existent." Nothing else is eternal or self-existent, so the analogy between nature and God based on complexity doesn't hold. God has a quality -- self-existence -- that breaks the analogy.  

Dawkins' syllogism fails because it misrepresents what Christians are believe, and because it ignores one of God's essential attributes that make Him God.  Atheists should talk about what Christianity actually teaches, not pop philosophical balloon-animals.







0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    ​Archives

    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013

    RSS Feed