Ironworks Pike Community Church
(502)-863-1261
  • Home
  • About Us
    • How To Be Justified of Sin.
    • Music & Worship
    • What Makes Us Distinct?
    • Our History
    • Ministries >
      • Children
      • Women's
      • Youth
      • Adult Bible Study
    • Statement of Faith
  • Messages
  • Contact Us
  • Pastor's Blog

Is "The Force" Really Jesus In Disguise?

12/26/2015

0 Comments

 

There are good ways, tacky ways, and flat-out wrong ways to use pop culture for Gospel presentation.  Evangelism doesn't validate everything and anything. 

A few years ago, we attended a Christmas play at a local church. They were putting on a re-enacted Mayberry script, in which Andy presents the Gospel to cranky old Mr. Weaver. Maybe you remember the episode.

The church that night was packed. It was a pleasant evening. I can't say that sort of presentation is my cup of tea, but the Gospel was presented accurately. So, if someone came to Christ because of it, then I thank the Lord for that. After all, I was first meaningfully exposed to Christianity through Peanuts (I'm sorry, Willow Grove Presbyterian Church, but I don't remember a single thing from Sunday school, other than the thick white paste we used to glue down the cut-out apostles). 

The Mayberry play was a tad corny, but it wasn't a defilement of the Gospel. There's no built-in anti-Christian quality built into The Andy Griffith Show.

Well, what about Santa?

I've seen kneeling Santa figurines in creches next to the shepherds and wise men, adoring the Christ-child figurine. That's just weird, because it erases a line between Biblical, historical reality (Jesus Christ and the holy night of his birth) and a mythological fantasy (Santa). How would we feel about a painter putting the Easter Bunny hopping amidst the dead of Gettysburg? See what I mean? The very idea is terribly tacky at best, and blasphemous at worst.

However, I've seen Santa used in art pieces. Not plunked down in a creche, but just the Santa picture making some sort of pro-Bible, "Christmas is not about Santa" statement. If Santa is handled in an art piece symbolically, not inserted absurdly into a real event (the nativity), I can see that as worthwhile use.


You know, I can even imagine writing a play in which Jean-Luc Picard, the atheist captain of the USS Enterprise, realizes through the influence of the Bible, the error of atheism. Paramount studios would never let you stage it, but I can imagine a story like that. But, if you did write such a story, you should know that you were spitting on everything Gene Roddenberry believed in. Roddenberry was a fervent, fanatical atheist. There is a humanist message embedded in the DNA of Star Trek, and Christianity clashes directly with it.

Now:

imagine a TV program in which various "gods" (Zeus, Baal, Athena, whoever you can think of) talk about, and actually interact with, Jesus. Maybe, at the end, you have them all bow down to Him. Would that be excellent example of "contextualized" evangelism? Or would be it a crossing of truth-lines that should never be crossed? I say it's the second. 

The inherently evil nature of idolatry, combined with attributing reality to any "gods" at all (when Paul in 1st Corinthians say the gods do not exist), are crucial issues.  It would be worse than depicting, say, Mickey Mouse talking to Jesus, (even though I believe doing that would be ridiculous), because Mickey Mouse in his basic nature doesn't carry an anti-Christian meaning. He's just a plucky comical mouse who has comical adventures.

*This is why the VBS puppet plays I used to write for Mountainside Chapel never had Jesus in them. The little characters talked about Jesus, but Jesus himself was not a character in any of the plays I wrote).


The potential for creating confusion is huge, especially in children, regardless of whether it's done in the name of reaching people for Christ.

One must be very, very discerning about using pop-entertainment culture in the work of evangelism, especially if the pop culture thing you want to use already has a distinct philosophical or religious "gospel" of its own. "The Force", for example, is not a neutral thing. The Force is pantheism, and it is foundational to occult/wiccan thinking. 

But doesn't the Bible show the Bible writers using pop-cultural ideas and words to present the gospel? Consider how the Apostle John used the Greek word logos in John chapter 1. To the Romans and Greeks, the word logos​ referred to a universal, impersonal force of rationality, like a force of math, that ran throughout the universe and held everything together.

So in John 1, John took that distinctly pagan, philosophical, pop word, and he used it. Doesn't that justify using all pop-culture for evangelism? But John did not say, "Look, Romans, the logos that you believe in really points you to Jesus Christ...". No, John rejected the Greco-Roman meaning of the word.

John instead said that the logos was a person (not a force), a member of the Godhead (not part of nature), and that He became a human being!  By the time John was done with the word logos, he had completely re-defined it. I bet the Romans were irritated by John's total re-definition of "their" word, in a "who do these Christians think they are" kind of way. John in effect was demanding that the Romans abandon their false god, the logos.

In the same sense, Christianity requires us to abandon the idea of The Force. The Force cannot lead us to Jesus Christ. The Force isn't a good idea being misused, which is sometimes the case. No, the Force is a bad idea, bad from top to bottom. The Christian stance toward the Force should be to expose and refute it, not try to "redeem" it. You wouldn't enlist Zeus on behalf of Christianity, and you cannot enlist the Force for the same reasons. 

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    ​Archives

    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013

    RSS Feed